Skip to content
B

Editorial standards

How we research, fact-check, and update every article

Bharat Sarvaseva writes about money, taxes, government schemes, and legal documents. Get any of those wrong and the cost falls on the reader. This is the process we follow to make sure that doesn't happen — and the policy we follow when it does.

Our principles

Four commitments

Verified against official sources

Every claim about a government scheme, fee, deadline, eligibility rule, or tax rate is checked against the relevant .gov.in source — pmkisan.gov.in, uidai.gov.in, incometax.gov.in, epfindia.gov.in, indiabudget.gov.in, and state portals. We cite the source where it materially matters.

Updated when rules change

Indian government processes change frequently — fee revisions, eligibility amendments, new portals, retired forms. Each article carries a 'last verified on' date. When the underlying rule changes, the article is updated and re-dated, not silently edited.

AI-assisted, human-edited

We use AI tools to draft outlines and accelerate research. Every published article is then read, edited, and fact-checked by a human author before going live. AI is a writing aid here, not the author of record.

Transparent affiliate disclosure

Some outbound links to financial and legal service providers are affiliate links — we may earn a referral fee at no cost to you. We never let affiliate revenue change which products we cover, how we describe them, or which we recommend. Affiliate links are clearly disclosed at the article level.

Our process

From topic to publish

Every article passes through these five stages before it goes live.

1

Topic selection

Driven by reader questions, search-volume data, and gaps in existing Indian coverage. We prioritise high-intent how-to queries — 'how to apply', 'how to file', 'eligibility for X' — over speculation or news commentary.

2

Source research

Primary sources first: the relevant gov.in portal's official notification, FAQ, or user manual. Secondary: established Indian publications and chartered-professional explainers. Hearsay, AI summaries, and forum threads do not qualify as sources.

3

Drafting

An outline is built around a clear decision — should the reader do X or Y? Each section answers a specific sub-question. Numeric facts (fees, limits, deadlines) are cross-checked against the source on every redraft.

4

Editorial review

A second pass for accuracy, plain-English clarity, and completeness. Open questions are flagged for re-research or removal — we'd rather skip a section than guess.

5

Publish & monitor

After publishing, we monitor reader feedback and government circulars. Articles touching active rule changes (Union Budget, Finance Bill, EPF rate revisions, scheme renewals) are queued for review immediately when changes drop.

Corrections

Found an error? Tell us.

Government rules move. We make mistakes. If you spot one, please email us with the article URL and the corrected information — ideally with a link to the official source.

editor@bharatsarvaseva.com

Our corrections promise

  1. 1We acknowledge factual error reports within 3 working days.
  2. 2Verified errors are corrected within 7 working days, with the article's last verified on date updated.
  3. 3Material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article in a transparent "Corrections" line — we don't silently rewrite history.
  4. 4Reader-submitted corrections are credited (with permission) in the corrections line.

What we don't do

  • Provide individual legal, tax, or financial advice — content is general guidance only. For your case, consult a qualified professional or the relevant government office.
  • Publish unsolicited sponsored content as editorial. Sponsored posts are clearly labelled "Sponsored" at the top.
  • Republish AI output without verification. Automation drafts; humans verify and own what gets published.
  • Sell, share, or license reader email addresses to third parties. See our privacy policy.